#Nate newton dak upgrade
#Nate newton dak pro

So out of the entire NFC only team that even has any question mark going into next year are Giants and Bucs. Panthers = no, Saints = no, Falcons = no, Bucs ? So there is the nfc westĮagles= no, Commanders = no, Giants= ?īears = no, Packers = no, Vikings = no, Lions = no Cards+No, Niners= no, Rams = No, Seahawks = no. who the hell in the nfl is gonna go out and pay Dak 20 million? Please, lets start listing teams. Wins are all that counts when it comes down to it and playoffs wins are the most important so I guess we will see in two weeks how that works out.Ĭlick to expand.Bingo.

#Nate newton dak upgrade

Would I want an upgrade at some time, sure and I believe Dallas should draft a QB ever year to either develop or possibly give us a better option at QB but Dak wins and I could give a rat's behind about his stats. If we go by what those that hate Dak, or those that want a better QB that could take the Boys to a Super Bowl, then maybe we should find a Trent Dilfer because by the logic some are using he is a great, great QB. It is football dynamics plain and simple.Ĭan Dak be better, sure but same goes for probably 20+ other starting QBs. A proven QB like Dak would fetch at least a #1 if not more. Look what teams give up to move to the top of the draft to get a guy that might or might not do anything. And to those that think you could only get a 4th round choice for him in a trade, then you have no clue on how teams value QB especially ones that win. If you don't think Dak at $15 year is a bargain then you don't understand QB salaries in the NFL. Look what Case Keenam got in Denver for two years.

Check what Matt Ryan got at 37 years old, check what Bradford got for one season. Why would they, simply because the going rate for QB is going nothing but up. If Nate believes Dak would take 13 to 15 million a year and the Jones believe he is the future at QB, you can bet they will jump on that number. Whether you believe he is a top 20 QB (by stats) or top five (by wins) doesn't matter. All that matters is what the Jones think and what Dak believe is fair, nothing else matters. It is pretty irrelevant what any of we fans believe is a good contract or not for Dak. It is only relevant what Jones believes is best for the position. And it is irrelevant what you or I do or want about the position. They pushed all their chips into the pile in October 2016 and I believe they are still sitting there And to be blunt, I do not think Jones or his offspring have a Plan B in the works. That sort of investigative reporting has not and likely will not happen, so I am left considering What Jones Will Do based on my personal three decade long observation of the man.

#Nate newton dak pro

If anyone could peek behind his narcissistic curtain for even a few moments, pro and con observers of the position might receive some concrete info concerning any Plan B conceived by the front office.

In my opinion, Jones' perceived value of Prescott has remained completely unchanged-especially after he sacrificed future high draft round resource in obtaining Cooper to bolster the offense this season.Īll this aside, I myself would be appreciative if the media would consistently pose similar questions to Jones like the one you directed to me. He made a decision about the position in 2016-a decision I have always believed and maintained was premature. Interpreting and reacting to the market is a TAD more complicated than the Sanders/Newton ideology understands.Ĭlick to expand.It is not theory.

Sign the player to a HIGHER contract than one that the player could get elsewhere, secure the player already on the roster, and satisty existing confidence by retaining a known commodity.

Allow the player to sign elsewhere, albeit at a contract smaller than the one which could have been extended to him, and hope another player will instantly replace his preceived value to the team.

Thus, the current employer must address two scenarios: However, the market has determined the player's value will be meet elsewhere. In other words, another team could pay the player a SMALLER contract.Īnyone self-engrossed in the 'Pay him what he is worth' mentality, like Sanders and Newton, automatically agree the player should be allowed to walk in that situation. This consideration is ignored by those sharing Sanders and Newton's ideology.Ī player and his agent may review his contract opportunities beyond his current employer and understand he may attract lower compensation than what he seeks currently.

Contracts are designed to retain a player's sense of security and perceived self-worth to the team.